Evolution is a Religion

Evolution is defined as:

1. The process by which different kinds of living organisms are thought to have developed and diversified from earlier forms during the history of the earth. (Merriam   Webster)White bearded head of Darwin with the body of a crouching ape.        

2. A gradual process in which something changes into a different and usually more complex or better form. (Free dictionary.com)

 

The idea for this post came as a result from reading this article on CNN. The writer had the audacity to both  title and conclude that evolution was truth, and as such, Jesus would believe in evolution and so should you”. While stating there is much evidence for evolution, the author was only able to cite one. This “evidence” garnered from the Human Genome Project, he says, shows that humans share a “broken gene” with many other primates, namely chimpanzees, orangutans, and macaques. After asking the earth shattering question of how could it be that “different species can share identical broken gene?” he, along with other evolutionists are left with “the only reasonable explanation” that – hey, it’s because it was inherited from a common ancestor. So according to him this ‘new evidence from genetics’ serves to confirm what Darwin claimed ~ 150 years ago. The author also threw in this little bit of fools gold into the piece: “While Genesis contains wonderful insights into the relationship between God and the creation, it simply does not contain scientific ideas about the origin of the universe, the age of the earth or the development of life.” This is what’s presented as the truth of evolution. The one in which Jesus would believe, as should you.

 

First and foremost, if this person was talking about the Jesus of the Bible, then he would have clearly seen that God created man in his own image, then later formed Adam from the dust of the ground. How ignorant to think that man who was given dominion over all these things, would now turn around later to declare he’s really no better than these things, matter of fact they all started out in the same form but man, evolved to where he is today.

To further illustrate his diabolical beliefs, which are certainly  not of God, the author expounds “To understand how the heavens go we must read the book of Nature, not the Bible. The Book of nature reveals the truth that God created the world through gradual processes over billions of years, rather than over the course of six days, as many creationists believe.”  Isn’t this a direct contradiction to what the Bible says? So now he knows more than God Almighty that created all things.

I quote this from my most favorite Writing Ministry:

Somehow, somewhere, in the corridors of time, the spiritual and the scientific (logic) became separated from each other. The scientists took on a technical arrogance of thinking that through the power of their own intellect, they knew or could explain all things. Little did they know how blinded they were to the unseen world. The problem of blindness due to losing contact with the unseen world of the spirit is not just limited to scientists, it is also common to religionists who major on the “letter of the law” without having the benefit of the spiritual realm to interpret the letter.

God sends parables to sift humanity, to throw off the wicked. He does not throw his precious pearls to swine. The wicked will always try to find an easy route to the truth. However, they will not have the knowledge because the love of the Father is not in them. They will therefore fabricate their own information leading to their own destruction.

10  And he said, Unto you it is given to know the mysteries of the kingdom of God: but to others in parables; that seeing they might not see, and hearing they might not understand. (Luke 8:10 KJV)

His disciples asked him what this parable meant, and he said, ‘It has been granted to you to know the secrets of the kingdom of God; but the others have only parables, so that they may look but see nothing, hear but understand nothing.’ (Luke 8: 9-10 NEB)

Mt 7:6 Give not that which is holy unto the dogs, neither cast ye your pearls before swine, lest they trample them under their feet, and turn again and rend you.

Ohhh so you think the earth is only 6000 years old, what kind of dummy are you?

Scientists believe the earth came into existence about 4.54 billion years ago. The truth is no one knows the true age of the earth. God did not say the earth was 6000 years old. No one knows how long Adam was living in the garden of Eden before he was sent back to the ground (earth realm) from which he was formed. So Adam could have been in Eden for 6 million years, 600 million years, 6 billion years—no one in this realm knows

There is nothing factual in the presented ‘evolutionary evidence’ that points toward man evolving from a lower/earlier form to the ‘now complex’ being he is. Neither is there any factual evidence pointing to man sharing a common ancestor with the above mentioned mammals. Evolution is not a fact. It’s a belief just like religion. You have to accept it based on faith. Faith described in the Holy Bible is the evidence of things not seen (Heb 11:1). There is absolutely zero evidence supporting evolution. And this is what makes evolution a religion. If there’s anyone out there who has factual evidence for evolution please demonstrate this fact with supporting evidence. Do not make mention of mutation of viruses and bacteria. Mutation does not lead to a general increase in the genetic information of the more complex specie (since we’re supposedly gradually progressing from a lower form to a more complex one). I should also point out that the scientific principles of natural selection and adaptation are not the same as evolution. The author assumed that the “broken gene” shared by man as well as a few primates is evidence for common ancestor, and ultimately evolution. Why is there this concept of similarity being the evidence of causality.

Evolution is simply a mix of Hinduism and Buddhism. Many evolutionists, like Darwin, who many incorrectly believe was the father of evolution, were Hindu or Buddhists, who believe things start at a lower realm and keeps cycling until it achieves a higher realm. Evolution however only proceeding to a more complex and higher realm. This pagan concept (which began in India around 1200 BC) that God is everything and that nature is God, espouses a cyclical universe, and all creation evolving from a tiny atomic particle. Hmmm…. Oh Yes, the Big Bang theory was put forth 3400 years ago.

 

 

 

Advertisements

10 thoughts on “Evolution is a Religion”

    1. Thanks for your question. I believe I stated my reason– there are no supporting facts for evolution. So if you choose to believe it, then you’re doing so by faith. And this makes it a religion.

      1. I’m inclined to think that you have not actually explored outside of your religion. There is an abundant amount of evidence that supports evolution. May I ask why you think that that the vast majority of scientists accept evolution as a fact? Do you think it’s just a big conspiracy?

  1. Excellently said! The observation that human societies are actually crumbling from within seems to confirm the hoax of evolution. If humans were evolving, there would be some improvement beyond life expectancy, I would think!

    Nice read!

    1. Thank you barb. Your observation is 100% spot on. 2Th 2:11 And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie. (Because they receive not the love of the truth).

  2. Oscar, while there may be some truth to me not exploring outside my religion, what I have posted is that the roots of evolution are in other religions, namely Hinduism, Buddhism. The Hindu religion believes that everything came from a tiny particle of atom. That after hundreds of millions of years there was a splitting which formed the heaven and the earth.

    I want to reiterate that evolution is not the same as natural selection or adaptation.

    Scientists are human beings like you and I, with strong philosophical and religious beliefs which will influence what side of the fence they’re on. (Which I’ve stated – the ones that support evolution are more likely Hindus, Buddhists, atheists, etc.)

    They are not superior in this matter,(even by virtue of their work) because they’re attempting to explain a unique event from the past, one that’s impossible to examine in a lab or elsewhere. Therefore you or I can choose to accept/reject their conclusion in this area.

    It’s a conspiracy in the sense that this is just another fabrication so that mankind is deluded about his origins.
    We’re headed into a period, where nature which is a part of God’s creation is being raised up to the level of god. I should point out that conspiracy just means spirits communing.

  3. There’s no preponderance of evidence in evolutions favor.
    Remember, evolution advocates 2 claims: 1. The origin of life on earth. 2. The diversity of species.
    Scientists believe the earth is ~4.5 billion years old. They’ve postulated that life began in a primordial soup that was hit by lightning thereby generating a complex chain of molecules. It is this chain of molecule that over 4.5 billion years was supposed to rearrange themselves into DNA/proteins, first unicellular organism, multicellular organism, present day complex organism. This they thought would have been a simple process, which has proven otherwise.
    The oldest fossil found by scientists has been dated back to ~3.8 billion years ago. This means that within 700 million years this single celled cyanobacterium appeared. But from where? 700 million years is not enough time for it to evolve because of the complexity of the single cellular organism. The most complex thing about this “simple organism” is the DNA. It had to have DNA before its existence. 700 million year is the problem. So even they have finally admitted there just isn’t enough time for this DNA to be formed. They’ve now postulated that DNA hitched a ride on a comet hitting the earth. How preposterous!

  4. Where are you getting your information??? I still think my initial assessment of you not venturing far from your religion still stands. From the information you have given, it seems like you lift your information straight from Christian apologetic websites.

    “Remember, evolution advocates 2 claims: 1. The origin of life on earth. 2. The diversity of species.”

    False. Evolution does not, nor has it ever, make claims pertaining to the origin of species. Evolution merely explains the diversity of life once life had started.

    “They’ve postulated that life began in a primordial soup that was hit by lightning thereby generating a complex chain of molecules.”

    Did you get all your information from ‘Expelled’? The ‘primordial soup’ theory, that you are referring to was proposed by Darwin as simply a thought experiment…~135 years ago. Really, if you are going to attack a theory, you should really learn the actual facts from secular sources, instead of rehashing information you get from religious sources. While it is true that the actual origins of life is still being debated, the Miller-Urey experiment proved that the building blocks of life can be spontaneously generated under certain circumstance (I must warn you, please don’t start citing Lee Strobel or anyone from the Discovery Institute, because most of their “contentions” with the experiment are disingenuous at best and deceitful at worst).

    “The oldest fossil found by scientists has been dated back to ~3.8 billion years ago.”

    False. The oldest fossils we have are the stromatolites, dating back to ~2.7 billion years.

    “They’ve now postulated that DNA hitched a ride on a comet hitting the earth.”

    Where on earth have you heard this from? Citation needed.

    1. Darwin’s Theory of Evolution – The Premise
      Darwin’s Theory of Evolution is the widely held notion that all life is related and has descended from a common ancestor: the birds and the bananas, the fishes and the flowers — all related. Darwin’s general theory presumes the development of life from non-life and stresses a purely naturalistic (undirected) “descent with modification”. That is, complex creatures evolve from more simplistic ancestors naturally over time. In a nutshell, as random genetic mutations occur within an organism’s genetic code, the beneficial mutations are preserved because they aid survival — a process known as “natural selection.” These beneficial mutations are passed on to the next generation. Over time, beneficial mutations accumulate and the result is an entirely different organism (not just a variation of the original, but an entirely different creature).
      (this was taken from:http://www.darwins-theory-of-evolution.com/)

      The citation you requested: (http://www.panspermia.org/threetests.htm)

      The ONE & ONLY site I read is listed in my reference. If you feel so inclined check it out. (The last posting was done at least 5 years ago, that’s the one to read if you so choose). Don’t worry, you won’t be converted. Ideally, there should be no division between religion and science. The chastisement used in my post which was taken from this site, was directed at both scientists and religionists.

Share your thoughts

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s